Grt idea! Let’s do this team!
I would agree with most others here - as the project attracts more money, please hire and recruit other developers to speed up the roadmap. This is exactly what DFK has done, and a key reason for their success.
Secondly, in terms of other blockchains, I would drop ETH and BSC. A year ago ETH was 99% of DeFi TVL - now it is about 60%. We can’t even be sure sharding will launch this year, and even if it is does, it might not solve the gas issues. Too many uncertainties. BSC is ok, but too many scam coins on it for me. AVAX and FTM (as another user said) are both much better options. Personally I would go AVAX first, then MATIC then FTM.
9 Likes
Yeah the most important thing is to deliver on the milestones. Getting the colonists working so people have a character to level and do quests is huge. Giving more details so people have things to theory craft is also huge. But focus on having a character that we can level up with our bases or for users that don’t own land so they can do something on Mars too.
3 Likes
I think if you follow the basic roadmap that DFK did, then this token will do well. I think having Liquidity Pools as soon as possible will help tremendously with the falling price over the last 7 days. I know the team is on this and I believe I heard it is happening this week. That will be huge! Characters probably need to be the next thing developed because people want a use case for the token beyond just upgrading bases and LP. Thanks. Love the project and will be doing everything I can to spread the word about it. Great work on hitting all Roadmap milestones so far!
4 Likes
Hey @crypto_wyatt thanks for the feedback! I am more than agree with that. Right now our focus is to build more features/products that will utilize or burn CLNY tokens.
We got a lot of feedback about launching
- MC DEX (with LP against CLNY)
- MC Stable coin that will be backed by DEX’s LPs
- Lending protocol to get loans against NFT Land’s
So we do research around these topics and will let you know, once we prioritize one of them.
3 Likes
Hey @JellyBean thanks for sharing the feedback about multichain expansion. I do agree with you and also consider Avax and Polygon as the next chains to launch settlers. Fair to mention that launching new chains makes sense when we set the MC Ecosystem here and will be able to scale further.
Do you have any thoughts on what multichain should look like? Should MC Harmony be connected with MC Polygon or they should grow as separated Colonies with the cross-chain trading bridge?
Do you think is possible to get a support from these teams before launch the project ?
Continuously working on it!
1 Like
Hello @father,
In my opinion, MC Harmony must be connected with MC Polygon. For the GameFi, it could represent somethink like “Interplanetary trade”, and in fact, cross-chain protocol now is the key. We can imagine like a Planet per Blockchain, and if we can have case uses for the same Token in different blockchain, it will attract more users from each blockchain. For example, Hermes DeFi have 2 tokens, IRIS and Plutus. IRIS can be used on Polygon for farming, vaults, etc but also governance for Plutus which is on Harmony. You can even stake IRIS for earn Plutus on the protocol so what’s happened ? Investors on Polygon go on Harmony to earn Plutus and Investors on Harmony go on Polygon to swap Plutus for IRIS to have a vote power on the protocol. We can imagine same thing for the DeFi part of the Project. If we go cross-chain and every part of the game is connected to each others, I think it’s the best idea for all the community.
Fell free to answer, I want this project to be an amazing game, don’t hesitate to counter or debate, will be happy to discuss.
3 Likes
I do research about cross-chain implementation, and your feedback is more than useful. Thank you for that. I’ll share a draft of the vision once I have something meaningful to discuss.
1 Like
I hope you wont issue another token to go multichain,
and nft would be able cross chain if possible
the demand comes…when the game will evolve into a Verse…where 2nd 3rd 4th Gen of NFT comes into a play…the space grows…it becoms a 20+million gamer verse…then comes a plot into a play…20MILION people is audiance…where audience…there is adversment…so coca-cola sends you a contract for $ pred day…so they can have a sign on your plot…its as nothing for them…but changes your life 
so the best thing would be…creating creating NFTs on plots…and let people mint them…creatures, robots, spaceships…making utility out of them and lets say more Gen 0 NFTs on Mars. Somebody playing on my plot is ok as long as I take% 
2 Likes
Is there a way to show (highlight) “for sale” plots on the main map? This would make it much easier to look for lands to purchase.
5 Likes
@father What does it means “releasing treasury fund to CLNY holders”? How much of the treasury is going to be released? With what objective? What requisite clny holders have to achieve to receive treasury fund?
Hey @cryptoheyarnold treasury fund is a tool/incentive that allows the colony to grow further. We plan to release it step by step. Can’t tell you the exact amount for the first stage, but the end goal is to release 100%.
Objective - to grow the colony (anything related to the success of the colony: funding development, growth, reinvesting etc)
To achieve that we need to move completely to DAO, when all decisions are made via decentralized governance framework.
10 Likes
Forward, @father
I see a lot of goals for Q1 '22. What is the priority ranking for completing DeFi vs Gamification vs Governance? I understand the need for a DAO moving forward; this seems to be getting the most attention to date.
The DAO is an internal matter mostly, with gamification and DeFi being external, i.e. they are exposing us to a larger audience and are things they can participate in without necessarily holding land or other.
Your thoughts on these points are welcome.
1 Like
Hey @O.G.Martian12900 very good point. Let me update the road map according to the current priorities and get back to you 
Relating to : Epoch 7: Colonizing other Blockchains.
I speak for most people here and i can say most people are not to happy about this because its a bad idea. on its own it looks like a money grab, unless it is properly addressesed and communicated. And the real question here is our do we as the genesis holder benefit directly ? This Epoch7 is what will define whether this project has a future or not. Full disclose i’m on discord and i’ve listened to both AMA’s and this seems to be a question that is not being answered truthfully. I know in the AMA they talked about there being no competition with other blockchains. which is totally wrong and the whole community knows this. a lunch of another mars colony on another blockchain is a direct competition because it diverts interest from one blockchain to another which is doing better. For instance if this is launched on ethereum , ethereum has more liquidity so the price of land and clny will be much higher and therefore people on that blockchain benefit more than people on other blockchains. We members of marscolony on harmony made marscolony famous, it looks like you’ll be using that to launch on another blockchain where we will not have land there and continue to profit on our expense.
point1 ) when Marscolony was launched on one harmony it already had been launched another blockchain(binance) and failed. how do i know this because they where people in the group who posted this that another project by the same devs had been abandoned. So where all these people compensated, if so with what? So already this multichain blockchain colonising mars thing is a bit suspect at best. Unless all these blockachains are using the same token(clny) where its all interlinked where we all benefit from ethereum,matic or binance volume increase where its a win win for everyone not just the devs herer then here is best solution:
proposal to make this fair for everyone who has already bought land on harmony mars colony if these block chains are going to be independent.
Every new block chain launch should have a total of 42000 pieces of land.
the first 21 are automatically given to harmony one land owners on a 1:1 ratio for free and the rest are minted. because mars colony will already be famous mint price can be double lets $500.
another example. just because coke or any of the big brands launch in different countries, it doesn’t mean the shareholders are excluded from dividends from that country. which what you dev’s are trying to do ? if invest and am a shareholder if the brand grown and launches in different countries(blockchains) as a shareholder i should get a proportional monetary share to my holdings. otherwise if you are just cheating us. then at the financial meeting where shareholder vote, in this case the mars colony Dao we vote against these multichain blockchains because we don’ fully understand how this will benefit us, but as the devs you press on continuing, my question becomes is this still a community run project as you say or do already have an ulterior motive.
So to Mars colony Dev’s could please properly answer and not waffle on what exactly is Epoch 7 and how does it benefit us directly.
2 Likes
I must admit, when I first read the title, I was a bit against this, however, after reading through the logic of what is being said, the arguments made with regards to branding and expansion of that brand to other blockchains is a legit argument. Logically, the intellectual property going into the development of the code to be used on other blockchains are on the backs of investors both, BSC and ONE investors, these investors should be allowed to reap the rewards from their investment into the team and project that helped shape the value it brings to future investors. I think the dev team should really think about the investor when it comes to expansion, particularly those that helped build your brand (product) and help shape it. “Never forget those that helped you achieve your goals” Unknown author.